Nearly every team in the NHL has at least one contract it would like to get rid of. For some teams, that deal is a significantly bigger albatross. Here is every team's worst contract, not including players on LTIR, graded from 1-10 (10 being the worst) based on the following criteria:

• Cap hit
• Years remaining (current season not included)
• Age
• Player's value
• Player's expected value over duration of contract
• Ease with which a team could dispose of contract

The deals are grouped into three tiers, starting with the stuff of general managers' nightmares.

Worst of the worst

Thirteen-year contracts never seem to end well, and not even halfway through, Parise's deal is already brutal. Injuries have held him back over his entire tenure with the Wild, and seem to have rapidly aged him. He has just five goals this season. Grade: 10/10

Yes, Price plays behind a dreadful Montreal Canadiens team, but it's ignorant to think his game hasn't fallen off too. An injury-prone, declining goaltender heading into the back nine of his career with a $10.5-million AAV would handcuff the smartest GMs in the league, never mind Marc Bergevin. Grade: 9/10

Ryan hasn't been the player he was for Anaheim since coming to Ottawa, but the last two seasons have marked a new low. On the bright side, Ryan's massive salary will help the Sens reach the cap floor if they ultimately deal Erik Karlsson. Grade: 9/10

Eriksson never jelled with the Sedins like Jim Benning hoped he would. Nor has he really jelled with anyone else, for that matter. Grade: 9/10

Lucic is already a caveman in today's NHL. He's too slow to keep up in a game dominated by youth and speed, and with each coming season, he'll fall further behind. Grade: 9/10

Though still serviceable, Seabrook's play declined sharply this year. He's trending in the wrong direction on a team doing the same. Grade: 9/10

Ladd's deal was disastrous from the get-go. He still managed to score 23 goals last year, but had only eight assists. His production has dipped even more this year, and it's hard to imagine he'll ever return to being the player he was in Winnipeg. Grade: 9/10

Nielsen is still a decent two-way center, albeit slightly overpaid. However, as he approaches his mid-30s, this contract could become ugly, fast. Grade: 8/10

Staal never had much offensive flair, but the shutdown defensive ability he was known for has deteriorated over the last few years, and it's unlikely he'll rebound. Grade: 8/10

Dubinsky can still play an in-your-face defensive role, but those types of players generally make a couple million, not $5.85M. Grade: 8/10

Bad, but tolerable

While Okposo was decent in his first season with Buffalo, he's dropped off this year. He's relatively young as far as the players on this list, however, and though it's a long contract, he could have a couple 50-point seasons left in him. Grade: 6/10

Backes is still a strong defensive forward, but can he remain as such while contributing offensively into his mid-30s? Probably not. Grade: 6/10

Brouwer doesn't give the Flames anything, really, but $4.5 million isn't ridiculous money, and this deal can be disposed of fairly easily. Grade: 6/10

Martin has played more AHL games than NHL games this season, and he'll likely be buried in the minors again next year. At least that'll be the end of it. Grade: 6/10

Though Spezza's play has cratered, the Stars only have to deal with it for one more season. Grade: 6/10

MacDonald definitely isn't worth $5 million, but he's still playing top-four minutes on a playoff team, so he must be doing something right. Grade: 5/10

After three sensational seasons as Chicago's backup, Darling's first campaign as a starter has been a nightmare - he lost his job to Cam Ward. He's got lots of term left to bounce back, but it looks unlikely. Grade: 5/10

Callahan still does things to help the Lightning win. Those things shouldn't cost $5.8 million. Grade: 5/10

As the Devils' captain, Greene clearly provides something beyond what he brings on the ice, but $5 million is a hefty price. Grade: 5/10

Though Orpik is as mean as they come on the back end, that shouldn't result in such a high cap hit. However, he should be serviceable for one more year. Grade: 5/10

Brown is having a major bounce-back season after four poor years in a row. Can he do this again? Grade: 4/10

Perry is no longer the $8-million player he once was, but he's still capable of 50-60 points. Grade: 4/10

Best of the worst

Considering the speedy Hagelin is the Penguins' worst contract, it's no surprise they've won back-to-back Stanley Cups. Grade: 3/10

Martin is probably Toronto's 14th-best forward, but this contract could easily be buried in the minors if necessary. Grade: 3/10

Allen hasn't proven he can be a legitimate starting goalie for a full season. While he's shown flashes, at this point he's more of an expensive, quality backup. Grade: 2/10

Goligoski might be miscast as a 23-minute D-man in Arizona, but he still produces offensively despite having few scoring options to move the puck to at forward. Grade: 2/10

The Jets just signed Kulikov this past offseason, and while $4.3 million seems steep for a sixth defenseman, they'll have the former first-rounder through his prime years. Grade: 2/10

Presently, Luongo is one of the most cost-effective goalies in the league. Whether he can maintain his elite play into his 40s remains to be seen. Grade: 2/10

Bonino is one heck of a third-line center, and $4.1 million doesn't hamper David Poile much at all. Grade: 2/10

Unsurprisingly, the best worst contract in the NHL belongs to the team that just became a team this year. Tatar wasn't producing like a $5.3-million player in Detroit, but there's plenty of time to right the ship in Vegas. Grade: 1/10

(Photos courtesy: Getty Images)
(Salary information courtesy: Cap Friendly)

Copyright © 2018 Score Media Ventures Inc. All rights reserved. Certain content reproduced under license.